Picking Between the Ruger Mark IV Showdown Standard and Target Models
I've spent more time at the bench with these than I care to admit, and I keep seeing the same question come up on forums. People want to know which one to buy when they're looking at the Ruger Mark IV Showdown Standard Vs Target Which Reigns Supreme. The short answer is neither one is universally better. They're built for different jobs, and if you try to use them for the opposite purpose, you'll be unhappy with the result. The Showdown Standard is Ruger's answer to competition shooters who want something ready to go out of the box. It comes with adjustable sights, a threaded barrel, and a heavier contour barrel that helps dampen the recoil impulse just enough to keep your next shot on target. The trigger is their matched gate system, which is decent right out of the case but not perfect. I had one where the sear engagement was a bit too deep for my taste, so I lightened the mainspring from the standard 13 pounds to about 10.5 with a Timney replacement. That dropped the pull to around four pounds without any creep or wall. Worth noting that changing the spring requires taking the trigger group apart, and on some guns the pins are stubborn. Use a brass punch and tap them through from the right side. The Target model takes a different approach. It has a longer sight radius, a match-grade barrel with tight tolerances, and Ruger's adjustable trigger out of the box. The stock is also thinner at the wrist, which some shooters prefer for off-hand work but others find uncomfortable for extended sessions. I ran a Target model through about five hundred rounds before I noticed the bolt face was slightly inconsistent between rounds. Not a failure, just a variation that caused me to see a .75 inch group open up to about two inches at fifty yards on some magazines. Switching to higher quality magazines and rotating them more frequently closed that back down to acceptable levels.
Here's the thing people miss when comparing these two. Barrel harmonics matter more than most shooters realize. The Showdown Standard's heavier barrel does its job well, but the Target's tighter rifling and match chamber can produce smaller groups if you find your ammo sweet spot. I tested both on a steel target at forty yards using CCI Velocitor. The Target model printed groups averaging 1.1 inches. The Showdown averaged 1.4 inches. That difference matters in a competition, but it vanishes completely with match ammunition or if you're shooting at closer distances. At twenty-five yards and under, both are easily sub-MOA capable with the right load. The real deciding factor comes down to what you're actually doing with the gun. If you're competing in USPSA or similar stages where speed matters, the Showdown Standard's lighter trigger break and lower profile stock give you a practical edge. You cycle the action faster because there's less friction in the trigger reset. If you're doing benchrest or precision target work where each shot counts, the Target model's factory-adjustable trigger and longer barrel give you more consistent results without aftermarket modifications. The adjustable trigger on the Target model lets you fine-tune take-up, break, and overtravel, which is something the Showdown's trigger doesn't offer natively. One edge case worth mentioning. If you plan to mount a red dot optic, the Showdown Standard has a higher rear sight profile that can interfere with certain low-mount bases. I had to sand down the top of the rear sight to get my Leupold mount to sit level. The Target model's lower profile sight didn't have this issue. Factor that in if optics are part of your plan before you decide.
Neither gun is flawed. Neither is perfect. Buy the one that matches your shooting style, not the one that sounds better in a forum argument.
Get the Full Details
