Navigating Professor Reviews at UTSA Without Losing Your Mind
I have spent years watching students blindly trust ratings on RateMyProfessors and then end up completely unprepared for a class. The platform itself is fine as a rough starting point, but treating it as gospel will get you into trouble. UTSA has over 2,000 faculty members and the review ecosystem there has some specific quirks that people who have used it for a while notice quickly. The site gives two numbers: quality and difficulty. Quality ranges from 1 to 5 and reflects overall student satisfaction. Difficulty ranges from 1 to 5 where 1 is extremely easy and 5 is brutal. These are independent scales, which means a professor can be rated 5 stars for quality and still be a 5 in difficulty. That is not a contradiction. That just means the class was hard but fair, or the professor is genuinely good at teaching despite the rigor. Most students only look at the stars and skip the written reviews. That is your first mistake. The written comments contain the actual information you need. Look for specifics like how the professor handles accommodations, whether they release exams early, if attendance is mandatory, and what the final is like. Those details matter far more than a composite score.
The review filtering system is another layer people ignore. You can sort by department, by course, or by term. The term filter is critical because a professor who taught online during 2020 likely had a completely different experience than they do now teaching in person. I once saw a professor rated a brutal 4.8 difficulty based entirely on reviews from a single remote semester where the grading standards broke down. When I checked the more recent reviews from the same department, the difficulty dropped to a 3.2. The older reviews were still sitting at the top because of sorting defaults.
Reading the Reviews Like Someone Who Has Actually Taken UTSA Classes
The biggest bias in the system is called grade defense. Students who get low grades are disproportionately motivated to leave a negative review. Students who get A's tend to just graduate and forget the class exists. This skews the average downward across the board. UTSA professors who give realistic grades will appear harder than they actually are simply because the people leaving the most scathing reviews are the ones who did not put in the work. Another pattern specific to UTSA is the large introductory course problem. Classes like PRSC 1, BIOL 1413, or ENGL 1301 often have dozens of adjunct instructors teaching the same course code. The reviews get pooled under a single department page rather than under individual instructors sometimes, especially if the department uses shared course shells. This makes it nearly impossible to distinguish between a terrible TA and an excellent one within the same course. I learned this the hard way during my second semester when I picked a section of ECON 2352 based on department-level ratings and ended up with an instructor who posted zero lecture notes and ran every class as a guided discussion. The department average for that course was a 3.7 quality, but individual ratings ranged from 2.1 to 4.9 depending on the section. The workaround is to search the professor's last name directly, not the course code. RateMyProfessors usually lists individual instructors even within large departments, but you have to scroll past the aggregated course pages. Check the individual profile. Cross-reference the terms. Look for patterns in the language. If three or more reviews from different semesters mention the same specific complaint, that is a real pattern, not an outlier.
Get the Full Details
Pitfalls That Will Mislead You
Browse voting is real. Some students will click through randomly and give uninformed ratings. The site has filters to catch obvious bots, but casual voting inflates review counts without adding useful signal. A professor with 300 reviews is not necessarily more trustworthy than one with 40 well-written reviews. Trend changes are another blind spot. UTSA has undergone significant departmental restructuring over the past decade. Some programs switched from lecture-heavy formats to hybrid models. Professors who adapted early show up as 4.5 quality ratings. Those who did not adapt are sitting at 2.8 and the reviews reflect the same teaching style they have used for fifteen years. The rating itself does not tell you whether the professor changed their methods. There is also the phenomenon of course-specific reputation bleeding into the professor's overall rating. If someone had a terrible experience with a specific required course like MATH 2413, they may leave a generally negative review that gets attached to the professor's profile even though the complaint was about the curriculum design, not the teaching. The rating system cannot separate those two things.
A Practical Method That Actually Works
Start by identifying the course you want to take. Search UTSA's official course catalog and note the course number. Then go to RateMyProfessors and search the course by its UTSA code. You will see all the professors tagged with that course. Sort by most recent reviews first. Read the five most recent reviews for each instructor. Ignore the helpfulness vote count. It is mostly noise. Look for consistency across time. A professor who has maintained a 3.8 or higher quality rating across at least four different semesters with different student demographics is likely solid. Flag any professor whose rating shifted dramatically between terms. That usually indicates a teaching change or a policy change that affected the classroom experience. Check the UTSA syllabus repository if your department publishes them. Some departments make current syllabi available through the course management system. Comparing what the syllabus says about grading policies to what the reviews say about those same policies will reveal whether the reviews are accurate or just venting.
Also pull the professor's faculty page from the UTSA website. You can see their appointment track, publication record, and office hours. Full-time tenure-track faculty tend to have more consistent teaching experiences across semesters. Lecturers and adjuncts may vary more depending on their other commitments. This is a rough heuristic, not a rule, but it helps when the reviews are thin or contradictory.
When the Reviews Are Useless
Sometimes a professor will have fewer than five reviews. This happens with newer faculty, visiting professors, or instructors in specialized graduate-level courses. In those cases, the rating system provides almost no signal. You are better off asking upperclassmen in your major through department Discord servers or student-run forums. UTSA has active chapter groups for engineering, business, nursing, and several other colleges where students share current semester advice that predates any posted reviews. RateMyProfessors is a tool, not an oracle. It gives you a direction, not a guarantee. Use it to eliminate clearly bad options rather than to confirm you have found the best one. The best professors at UTSA, like anywhere, are rarely the ones with the highest review counts. They are the ones whose reviews mention specific teaching behaviors that match what you need as a learner.
