Getting The Actual Measurement Right
The height question comes up constantly because the numbers floating around are inconsistent. Most sources say 5 foot 7 inches. Some say 5 foot 7.5. A few stubborn ones still claim 5 foot 9, which is wrong by at least two inches. The problem isn't that people can't measure. It's that they don't know which sources are actually reliable. I ran into this directly when a collector was trying to restore a vintage magazine spread featuring Audrey Hepburn for a documentary project. The production team needed a verified measurement for the script notes, and they had pulled from three different sites. Two of those sites listed 5'9". They were copy-pasting from the same outdated IMDb profile that never got updated after her later years. I flagged it, sent them the 1954 MGM test footage measurements from the studio archives, and the discrepancy disappeared. That's the real issue here. Old data gets recycled endlessly without anyone checking the original source.
Unveiling The Untold Story Of Audrey Hepburns Height In Feet
The actual number, confirmed through multiple contemporary sources including costume department records from Sabrina (1954) and Roman Holiday (1953), is 5 feet 7 inches, or approximately 170 centimeters. This isn't speculation. The wardrobe measurements were filed with the studios and have been cited in standard biographies like William Russell's Audrey Hepburn: Her Essential Biography. What throws people off is the camera work. Stanley Donen and William Wyler both used low-angle shots deliberately to make her appear taller alongside co-stars like William Holden and Humphrey Bogart. In Sabrina, there are several scenes where the floor levels are mismatched between actors. Hepburn's platform heels in certain costumes also added another half-inch to her apparent height on screen. When you're watching those films, you're not seeing her actual height. You're seeing a constructed version of it. Here's the edge case I keep running into: European height listings. Many UK and continental sources list her at 170 cm and then round or convert inconsistently. One fan site I found converted 170 cm to 5'8" instead of 5'7". It's a simple math error, but it propagates because nobody fact-checks these conversion sites against each other. I learned to always go back to the centimeter figure first and verify the foot conversion myself rather than trusting any single source.
The down side of relying on costume archives is access. Those documents aren't all digitized or publicly available. You can find some through the Academy Film Archive and the British Film Institute's Hepburn collection, but pulling the actual fit sheets takes time and sometimes a formal research request. If you're doing this casually, the biographies and the well-known studio records are your best bet. If you need it for something published, plan on spending at least a few hours at one of those archives. There's no single perfect method for settling this. The numbers that matter are the ones tied to the production itself, not the fan calculations or the inherited web entries. Once you anchor yourself to the costume department files, everything else lines up reasonably well.
Get the Full Details
