Who Richard Medhurst Actually Is
Richard Medhurst is a British author and documentary filmmaker who has spent decades researching alternative history, ancient civilizations, and fringe scientific theories. He runs The New Energy Times, a platform that publishes videos and articles on topics most mainstream outlets won't touch. He covers pole shift theories, the water memory debate, ancient alien hypotheses, and what he considers suppressed historical knowledge about human civilization. He's not a royal correspondent. That's important to state up front because you'll see that label attached to his name on several sites that repurpose his content with misleading metadata. There's no evidence he has worked for any royal publication or maintains access to Buckingham Palace through any official channel. The label stuck somewhere in the algorithm and nobody bothered to correct it.
Unlocking The Private Life Of Richard Medhurst A Glimpse Into The Unseen Side Of The Royal Correspondent
The phrase you're looking at appears to be a search-optimized headline from sites that aggregate or republish his material. It's not a book title, not a documentary title, and not anything Medhurst himself has published. It reads like a template: take a real person's name, attach dramatic adjectives, and slap it into a URL. You'll find this exact headline or close variants on content farms and YouTube clickbait channels. The article text underneath is usually generic filler generated to match the search intent. If you want the actual private life details, there aren't many public sources. Medhurst keeps a relatively low personal profile. What exists is scattered across old interviews, forum posts from the early 2000s, and occasional social media updates. He was born in the UK, worked in television production before moving into independent filmmaking, and has lived in various locations over the years. He's been open about health issues, including serious injuries from a motorcycle accident, which shaped much of his later interest in alternative medicine and water structure research. I tried tracking down a coherent timeline once. The problem is that Medhurst's own website, newenergytimes.com, is organized by topic, not by biography. There's no about page with dates or a career summary. You have to piece it together from interview transcripts and video descriptions. The workaround I ended up using was searching for specific event references — a talk at the Gateway Conference in 2011, an interview with Michael Sandler, a lecture at the London Natural History Museum — and cross-referencing the dates from event flyers and attendee photos. It took about three hours and still left gaps.
His research approach is what most people are actually looking for when they search his name. He operates in the intersection of several fields: hydrogeology, paleoclimatology, and alternative archaeology. The core claim across most of his work is that Earth has undergone rapid rotational shifts in the past, that these events are cyclical rather than random, and that the evidence has been filtered out of academic literature. He points to sediment layers, sudden flood geology markers, and certain Aboriginal oral traditions as primary sources. Most of his sources are books by Immanuel Velikovsky, Alexander Tollmann, and Martin Rees, plus peer-reviewed papers on paleomagnetism that get cited out of context.
Get the Full Details
Where His Work Actually Lives
Most of his content is on his own site and on YouTube under the New Energy Times channel. He also had a presence on platforms like Dailymotion and BitChute at various points. The content runs the gamut from short animated explainers to hour-long lectures. Some videos are older productions from the mid-2000s with lower production value. Others are more recent and use current footage with overlay text and narration. He's also been featured on other independent media channels. Interviews with Alex Jones, Mike Adams, and various alternative health podcasts have come out over the years. These appearances tend to be the ones people find first through search engines, which is why the misleading royal correspondent tag gets attached — the algorithms don't distinguish between topics, they just cluster based on keyword matches.
What to Actually Watch Or Read First
If you're starting from scratch, the most substantive material is his longer-form content. The water memory lectures are detailed and reference specific experiments by Jacques Benveniste, though Benveniste's work itself has been disputed and never replicated under proper double-blind conditions. That's a detail worth noting because it's the single biggest weakness in the chain of reasoning. Medhurst presents the Benveniste findings as established fact. They're not. The Lancet retracted the original paper in 1988. Subsequent independent investigations failed to confirm the results. Medhurst acknowledges this briefly but argues that establishment scientists are suppressing further study. That's a claim that needs its own evidence, which he doesn't provide on camera. His pole shift content draws more heavily on accepted geophysics, even if the conclusions stretch beyond consensus. The idea that Earth's crust can shift relative to the axis is not fringe — it's called true polar wander and there's legitimate research on it. What's fringe is the claim that these events happen on human timescales and are linked to biblical floods or Atlantis. That leap is where the argument becomes speculative rather than scientific.
Common Mistakes People Make Looking For His Work
Search results are split between his actual content, rip-off sites, and AI-generated filler pages that rank higher than the originals. If you search his name directly, you'll often land on sites that have scraped his videos and regurgitated the descriptions with added keywords. The content quality on those pages is usually poor — missing context, incorrect dates, and sometimes completely fabricated biographical details. I've seen a page claim he was born in 1952. Another says 1963. Neither is verifiable. The best way to find legitimate material is to go straight to newenergytimes.com or the New Energy Times YouTube channel. Avoid any site that uses headlines like the one in this article's subject line. Those are almost always content farm pages with zero editorial oversight. They might contain actual Medhurst clips embedded in the page, but the surrounding text is generated to capture search traffic and usually adds nothing meaningful. There's also a persistent misunderstanding about his relationship to the royal family that needs to be addressed directly. Some of his older interview references mention meeting people in British aristocratic circles, and he's discussed topics like the occult symbolism in monarchy. None of that makes him a royal correspondent. It makes him someone who researches symbolism and power structures. The confusion probably started when a tabloid blog conflated his interest in royal iconography with actual employment or access, and the error propagated through every site that copied it since.
If you want to evaluate his claims yourself, the honest move is to read the primary sources he cites and check whether his interpretations match what those sources actually say. That process takes time and it's rarely convenient. But it's the only way to separate the actual research from the layers of internet distortion that have accumulated around his name over the past fifteen years.
