Martina Navratilova's Racket Choices: What Actually Made Them Work
The Navratilova racket legacy isn't a single product. It spans several decades of equipment evolution, from the original Prince Graphic models she dominated with in the late 1970s through the Prince Textreme line that still carries her name today. Understanding which era matters for what you want to get out of it is the first thing most people skip. Navratilova's signature play style was built around an aggressive two-handed backhand, which meant her racket choices prioritized control and stability over raw power. That's the opposite of what most modern players assume when they see a "power" label attached to a pro model. Her early career rackets were wood-steel composite constructions — specifically the Prince Graphic 200 and the later Graphite 2 — that weighed around 350 to 370 grams unstrung with a 95 square inch head size. Those specs are unusual by current standards where 100 square inches and 300 grams is the entry-level baseline. The counter-intuitive part is that her most devastating shots didn't come from the racket generating power. They came from racket head speed and kinetic chain efficiency. A 95 square inch head with a dense string pattern (18x20 in later iterations) meant less ball pocketing but significantly more feedback. You could feel exactly where on the strings the ball contacted. That feedback allowed Navratilova to manipulate spin and placement at a level that larger head sizes generally cannot match.
Modern Prince Textreme Navratilova models have shifted toward 100 square inches with 16x19 string patterns, which is a compromise between her original control-oriented geometry and what today's game demands. The Textreme material — a carbon fiber weave developed by Prince — adds a slightly softer feel than standard graphite without sacrificing stability. For players transitioning from a 90 or 95 square inch frame to something larger, this material difference is noticeable within the first few sessions. I ran into a specific issue a while back when trying to replicate Navratilova's setup on a modern Textreme frame. The stock Prince spec calls for a static weight around 315 grams unstrung with a 33 cm balance point, which produces a swingweight in the low 330s. That swingweight felt too heavy for consistent two-handed groundstrokes when I tried it on clay. The workaround was straightforward: I strung it at 48 pounds with a gut/multihybrid setup and added three lead strips inside the handle — two at the bottom cap and one just above them — which shifted the balance point down about 2 centimeters. This made the racket feel more like the head-light stability Navratilova relied on rather than a cumbersome all-over-weight piece of equipment. Here are the practical specs you need to evaluate if you're looking at any Navratilova-branded or historically accurate setup:
Head size: 95 to 100 square inches depending on the era. The original Graphic line was 95. Modern reissues and Textreme models are 100. String pattern: 18x20 for the control-oriented versions, 16x19 for the power-oriented modern versions. This dramatically affects string movement and spin potential. Grip size: Navratilova played with a 4 3/8 inch grip (GR5). Most women's frames default to 4 1/4. If you grab a Navratilova spec racket off the shelf, check the grip measurement before buying.
Get the Full Details

Weight range: 300 to 350 grams unstrung depending on the model year. Anything below 295 grams unstrung will feel unstable against topspin-heavy modern groundstrokes regardless of how light it feels during warmups. The biggest pitfall I see repeatedly is players buying a vintage Prince Graphic because they read about Navratilova's success and then being confused when the racket performs nothing like it did in 1982. Those older rackets had different stiffness profiles, different dampening characteristics, and were strung at significantly lower tensions. A 95 square inch Graphite 2 strung at 55 pounds with modern polyester string will play nothing like the same racket strung at 50 pounds with natural gut in 1983. The stiffness (around 70 RA for the originals) interacts with string type in ways that modern multifilament or copoly blends don't replicate. If you want the actual Navratilova experience, the most practical route is a modern Prince Textreme Graphene 360+ Navratilova 100 with an 18x20 string pattern variant. It gives you the head size she ended her career with, the material composition she endorsed, and the ability to adjust weight and balance with lead tape if needed. The stock configuration works for players who already hit with an elevated two-handed backhand and want a frame that rewards flat, penetrating shots rather than heavy topspin loops.
There are honest limitations to this approach. The 18x20 pattern on any modern frame will reduce spin potential by roughly 15 to 20 percent compared to an 16x19 pattern on the same string and tension. If your game relies on heavy topspin from the baseline — and most junior-to-intermediate players do — the Navratilova spec frame will feel stiff and unyielding. In that case, a standard 100 square inch 16x19 frame like the Prince Textreme 100P or even a Babolat Pure Drive gives you more margin for error and easier spin generation. The vintage option exists if you want authenticity, but those rackets require careful sourcing. Genuine Prince Graphics from the late 1970s and early 1980s are no longer manufactured. Any "new" ones you find online are either reproductions or used frames that may have degraded composite materials. The graphite construction from that era was functional but not designed for the impact forces modern string tensions create. Restringing an original 1980s Graphic at tensions above 50 pounds risks frame stress fractures over time. For players serious about this setup, I'd recommend starting with a current-generation Textreme model, finding the right string and tension combination through trial over several weeks, and then deciding whether you need to chase vintage authenticity or if the modern interpretation already covers what you need. The equipment difference between Navratilova's peak years and what's available today is real but manageable with the right string bed and weight configuration.