How to Research a Public Figure's Digital Footprint — A Practical Guide Using Chef Erin French as a Case Study
Most people assume looking someone up online is just typing their name into Google and scrolling. It's not. At least not if you want anything useful. I spent about three weeks last year doing deep-dive research on a mid-level celebrity for a freelance piece, and what I learned has shaped every research session since. Let's use Chef Erin French as the subject. She's the woman behind The Lost Kitchen in Freedom, Maine, appeared on Netflix, and has a fairly visible but not wildly saturated online presence. Perfect testing ground.
Uncovering The Online Presence Of Chef Erin French A Culinary Pioneer In The Making
The Actual Process
Start with a broad net. Search her full name across multiple platforms simultaneously. I keep a browser open with tabs for Google, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, LinkedIn, and Archive.org running the same query. You'd be surprised how much platform-specific content exists that Google's main index doesn't surface reliably. Her Instagram @thelostkitchen is active but curated. Her YouTube presence is mostly through third-party channels like Netflix or food network uploads. Nothing she controls directly at the moment. Next, dig into the Wayback Machine. Enter her domain or any associated URL. I found several pages from The Lost Kitchen's site that no longer exist — important for understanding her brand evolution, but completely invisible without archival access. This step alone takes most researchers nowhere near enough attention. Then check social media metadata manually. Look at when her accounts were created, who she follows, and who follows her back. Follower ratios and engagement patterns reveal more than most people expect. For Erin French, her follower count on Instagram is in the hundreds of thousands, but the engagement rate tells a different story — it's modest for that audience size, which makes sense given how deliberately she controls her public narrative.
Here's where it gets specific. I once hit a wall researching a subject whose primary online presence was through podcast appearances and interview clips hosted on other people's sites. No official website, minimal social media. What I ended up doing was searching for the names of every show they'd appeared on plus their name, then using YouTube's transcript feature and Google's site-specific search to find every written reference across news articles, blog posts, and forums. It took four hours instead of twenty minutes, but the results were significantly richer than a standard search would've provided.
Get the Full Details

Common Pitfalls
The biggest mistake people make is stopping at the first page of results. Every notable person has noise around their name — other Erin Frenchs in different professions, unrelated social media profiles, forum mentions from twenty years ago. Disambiguation takes time. Filter by date, by platform, and by context clues in the snippets. Cross-reference anything you find against at least two independent sources before treating it as fact. Another issue is over-reliance on Wikipedia and IMDb. These are useful starting points, not endpoints. They're edited by strangers and often lag behind current information. I've seen profiles that were years out of date because the subject stopped engaging publicly and nobody bothered to update them. Always verify against primary sources when possible. There's also the problem of algorithmic filtering. Google and social platforms show you what they think you want to see based on your history and location. If you're researching someone from a different geographic region or using a different browsing profile, results can shift noticeably. Run searches from different contexts when accuracy matters.
What This Approach Misses
No amount of online digging replaces direct contact. A lot of digital presence is carefully managed or entirely absent by design. Some people maintain privacy intentionally. Others simply don't have a strong digital footprint because they work in analog or community-based environments. Erin French's restaurant operates on a reservation system that's notoriously difficult to access, and she's spoken publicly about valuing in-person experience over digital engagement. That's not a gap in research — it's information in itself. If you need current, verified information about someone's business operations, partnerships, or public statements, checking official press contacts or reaching out through verified channels is more reliable than trying to reverse-engineer their digital presence. It's slower but less prone to error.
Tools That Actually Help
Google Alerts for the person's name across news and blogs. The Wayback Machine for historical snapshots. Social Blade or similar tools for tracking follower growth patterns over time. People search aggregators like Pipl or TruePeopleSearch for contact information, though these come with accuracy caveats. For news and press coverage, Google News with date filtering and site-specific searches like "site:nytimes.com Erin French" cut through the noise significantly. For visual content, YouTube's advanced search and TinEye for reverse image searching can surface appearances that text-based searches miss. I've found entire interview segments and public appearances this way that never showed up in standard searches. The whole process for someone with a moderate public profile like Chef Erin French typically takes two to four hours if you're thorough, or thirty minutes if you're skimming. The difference is whether you care about getting the story right or just having enough to write something that sounds plausible.
