The Dutch Colonial Layer of Modern Jakarta
Most visitors to Jakarta walk straight past the oldest surviving colonial structures in Southeast Asia. They head to the Grand Palace or the shopping malls on Sudirman. Batavia—the original Dutch settlement established in 1619 on the ruins of the port city Sunda Kelapa—is still there, but it requires effort to find it. The neighborhood known as Kota Tua, or Old Town, contains the actual remains of the VOC administrative center, and understanding how to navigate it without falling into the tourist traps requires some preparation. The phrase in the title sounds contradictory because Batavia is in Indonesia, not America. But the connection exists through Dutch colonial naming practices and migration patterns. The Dutch West India Company established settlements in New Amsterdam (later New York), and Dutch colonial administrators who served in the East Indies sometimes sent their families back to American colonies or had relatives who did. More directly, several towns in the United States—including Batavia, New York, and Batavia, Illinois—were named after the Indonesian city by settlers who knew of the Dutch colonial outpost. For genealogical researchers and historians tracing Dutch-Indonesian-American migration paths, Batavia represents a single naming node that connects three continents. Here is how I approached this when I was researching Dutch colonial trade records for a family history project. I started at the Nationaal Archief in The Hague, pulled VOC shipping manifests from 1720 to 1780, and cross-referenced names that appeared in both Batavia passenger lists and New Netherland court documents. It took six weeks of reading faded handwriting in Dutch script before I found a single matching surname. The process is tedious but systematic, and the records are accessible if you know where to look.
What Actually Survives From the VOC Era
The Dutch East India Company governed Batavia as a fortress city behind walls that no longer exist. Most of the original infrastructure was demolished or repurposed over centuries. What remains includes: The Kota Museum, housed in the former City Hall building constructed around 1710. It contains maps, photographs, and administrative documents from the VOC period. The collection is incomplete—the British burned many records during their brief occupation in 1811—but the surviving artifacts are well catalogued. The adjacent Art and Ceramic Museum occupies what was once the company warehouse. The building itself dates to the late 1600s. Inside you will find Dutch Delft tiles, Chinese export porcelain that traveled through Batavia to Europe, and some early Javanese artworks that were collected by VOC officials.
The Jakarta History Museum was originally the main VOC church, built between 1640 and 1678. The interior was heavily renovated during the Indonesian nationalist period, but the exterior stonework and the grave markers in the courtyard belong to the colonial era. Several VOC directors and their families are buried there.
Get the Full Details

How to Actually Visit Without Wasting a Day
Kota Tua is about 40 minutes from central Jakarta by car, longer during rush hour. The area is compact enough to walk, but the heat and air quality make early morning the only comfortable window. I usually recommend arriving between 7 and 8 AM, before the tour bus groups show up around 9:30. The biggest mistake people make is treating Kota Tua as a single destination. It is not. The museums close at 5 PM, many smaller sites close even earlier, and the food vendors that make the area worth lingering for only appear in the late afternoon. Plan your museums for the morning, then spend the evening walking through the plaza area where local families actually gather. A detail most guidebooks miss: the free shuttle bus that circles the old town runs infrequently and the schedule changes without notice. I have waited 90 minutes for it twice. Use ride-hailing apps instead—they are reliable and cheap within this area.
For the Research Angle: Where the Records Actually Are
If your interest in Batavia leans toward genealogy or historical research rather than tourism, the paper trail is scattered across three countries. In Jakarta, the Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia holds some VOC administrative documents, but access is restricted and the cataloguing is poor. I spent a full day there once and was only allowed to view ten files out of the thousands I requested. The staff were not unhelpful—they simply had no system for handling foreign researchers. The Nationaal Archief in The Hague is far more useful. They have digitized portions of the VOC archives, though the search interface is clunky and not everything is online. The key collection is the Soerabaia en Batavia stukken, which contains administrative correspondence. You can request scans for a fee, or visit in person. Budget at least two days if you are doing serious work.
For American connections, the New York State Archives in Albany holds some Dutch colonial records that reference individuals who later appeared in Batavia records. The connection is thin—most Dutch colonists in New Amsterdam never went to the East Indies—but the overlap exists for certain merchant families who operated on both routes.

The Practical Limitations
Batavia as a historical site is frustrating in ways that are not obvious until you are standing in front of it. Many of the buildings in Kota Tua have been restored with questionable accuracy. The facades look colonial, but the interiors are often modern reconstruction. The monument to Sint Jakobus, which dominates the main square, is a 20th-century addition, not a colonial-era structure. You need to know what is original and what is decorative before you invest time in photographing or studying individual buildings. The climate is another factor. Jakarta is hot and humid year-round, and the old town has very little shade. I have seen people attempt half-day walking tours at noon and turn back after forty minutes. This is not a place for casual exploration in the afternoon. Plan accordingly. For genealogical research, the biggest bottleneck is the language barrier. VOC records are in 17th-century Dutch, which uses spelling conventions and abbreviations that are not covered in standard Dutch courses. If you cannot read paleography, you will need a translator, and finding one who specializes in Dutch colonial documents is difficult outside of academic institutions.
The naming connection to American towns is real but narrow. Batavia, New York was founded in 1809, roughly two centuries after the Indonesian city. The naming likely came through Dutch-American cultural memory rather than direct migration. Batavia, Illinois was named in the 1830s for similar reasons. These are etymological connections, not demographic ones. Do not expect to find Dutch-Indonesian family lines leading directly to these American towns without extensive archival work. If you want a deeper dive into the actual VOC daily life beyond the museum displays, the book "Batavia in the Seventeenth Century" by various authors at the Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies provides primary source translations. It is dense but thorough. The online resources are fragmented, and no single website gives you a complete picture, which is why the physical archives remain necessary for serious research.