Amy Sherald's Visual Strategy: What Actually Happened In The Studio

Amy Sherald changed how contemporary portrait painting talks about race and representation in America. Her work doesn't argue with you. It sits quietly in grayscale and saturated color and asks you to look longer than you probably want to. I've spent years studying how she built that effect, and more importantly, how the broader community of painters picked it up and ran with it. The Rise Of Amy Sherald Inside The Art Worlds Most Exciting Painting Image Activism Movement isn't just about one artist becoming famous. It's about a visual language that spread fast through MFA programs, Instagram, and gallery circuits in ways nobody really predicted in 2018. Her signature technique is straightforward on paper but impossible to fake convincingly. She renders skin in a range of grays rather than traditional flesh tones. Then she hits the clothing and backgrounds with flat, almost graphic fields of color — reds, blues, pinks, yellows that look like they were applied with a roller. The contrast between the muted face and the vivid surroundings does most of the conceptual work. It creates a visual tension that echoes ideas about Black identity in America without needing a single word of explanation. The underpainting matters more than most beginners realize. Sherald typically builds her grayscale values through layered glazes and scumbles rather than mixing gray paint and slapping it on. I learned this the hard way when I tried to shortcut the process by premixing a full range of grays and applying them directly. The result looked muddy and dead within two sessions. The difference between a living gray skin tone and a flat gray smudge comes down to transparency and temperature shifts in each layer. She often works warm undertones beneath cool grays, which gives the skin a subtle luminosity you can't get from a tube.

For the color blocks, the technique is nearly the opposite. She applies those areas opaque and flat, sometimes using a brush, sometimes a small roller, sometimes even a squeegee depending on the surface. The edge where the gray meets the color is usually sharp but not razor clean — there's a slight bleed or softness that keeps it from looking like a sticker. That softness is what makes it feel like a painting and not an illustration. It took me roughly three months of failed attempts before I stopped fighting the wet edge and started working with it. The fix was simple: let the first layer of color dry almost completely before introducing the next adjacent plane, then use a dry brush to soften just the border where they meet. Not merge them. Soften the boundary so it reads as intentional.

Why This Style Spread So Fast

Several factors converged. The art market was hungry for work that addressed racial representation without being preachy. Sherald's portraits do exactly that — they center Black subjects in a tradition of formal portraiture that historically excluded them, but they do it through formal decisions rather than manifesto. The Michelle Obama portrait in 2018 amplified everything exponentially. After that, galleries were fielding inquiries from artists worldwide who wanted to do the same grayscale-skin approach. The technique is also mechanically accessible. You don't need expensive materials or specialized equipment. A basic set of neutral ground tints, a few primary colors for mixing your grays, and whatever local color you want for the clothing areas. That accessibility is partly why it spread through social media so quickly. But it's also why the market got flooded with competent copies that lacked the compositional intelligence of the originals. Anyone can mix gray paint. Few can arrange a figure against a colored field in a way that feels deliberate rather than decorative. The movement also absorbed related approaches. Some painters dropped the grayscale entirely and went full local color on skin but kept the flat color blocking. Others inverted it — colored skin, neutral backgrounds. A significant subset moved away from portraiture altogether and applied the color-block principle to landscapes and still lifes. The common thread is the formal decision to treat certain areas of the picture as planes of pure color rather than modeled space. That's the actual technique that transferred, not the grayscale skin specifically.

Get the Full Details

Amy Sherald: American Sublime at the Whitney Museum of American Art
Amy Sherald: American Sublime at the Whitney Museum of American Art

What Actually Works In Practice

If you're trying to build work in this direction, start with the value structure before you touch color. Sherald's compositions are fundamentally black-and-white problems solved first. Get the arrangement of darks, midtones, and lights working in a small monochrome study, then translate that structure into your full palette. I wasted about six months on paintings where the color was right but the values fell apart when photographed. Digital evaluation — taking a photo and desaturating it — catches these problems instantly. For the skin grays, build a personal mixing chart. Every brand of white and every tube of black or neutral tint behaves differently. Your Pthalo Blue + Alizarin Crimson mix will read warmer or cooler depending on the binder and pigment load. Test everything on your actual support, not a separate scrap. Gessoed canvas reads differently than raw linen, which reads differently than gessoed panel. The difference is small but accumulative. The flat color areas need a consistent application strategy. I found that thinning the paint to a Cream-of-Wheat consistency and applying it in overlapping horizontal strokes with a flat brush gave me the most control over coverage and edge quality. Too thick and you get brush marks that compete with the flatness. Too thin and you lose the opacity needed to sit cleanly against the glazed skin area. Your paint should be fluid enough to self-level but opaque enough to cover in one pass.

The Limitations Nobody Talks About

This approach has real weaknesses. The most obvious is derivative risk. The visual language is so immediately recognizable that work in this style gets categorized quickly by curators and collectors. Once you're in the "Amy Sherald follower" bucket, it's hard to escape it. I've seen artists who clearly had stronger compositional instincts get overlooked because their work looked too much like the source material. The workaround is deliberate variation — shift the scale dramatically, change the figure placement, introduce pattern or texture into the color fields, or move the subject into environments that complicate the color reading rather than simplifying it. Another limitation is the drying time. The layered glazing approach for skin means you're working across multiple sessions. If you paint the gray areas in one sitting, they tend to look flat and plastic. The luminosity comes from seeing through successive translucent layers to the warmer ground below. But that also means your color-block areas have to dry fast enough to not interfere. Acrylic works faster for the blocks but loses the ability to blend edges subtly. Oil gives you more working time but requires patience and solvents. There's no perfect material solution here. The market saturation is a real concern. Galleries and online buyers have seen dozens of variations on this approach. The novelty factor has worn off in many commercial contexts. That doesn't mean the technique is dead — it means the easy wins are gone. Work that succeeds now needs to bring something beyond the surface style. Strong drawing, interesting spatial relationships, meaningful content. The paint handling alone won't carry it anymore.

Getting Started

There's no single download or kit for this. The technique is purely painterly and requires hands-on experimentation. What you can do is study the actual paintings at high resolution — the National Portrait Gallery has good online images of her Obama portrait and other key works. Pay attention to where the edge softness occurs and where it's hard. Note how the gray skin tones shift temperature across different areas of the face. Those micro-variations are what separate a convincing rendering from a flat one. Start small. A 12x16 inch study of a hand or face against a solid color background will teach you more than three large failed canvases. Get the gray mixing right. Get the edge strategy right. Then add complexity. The movement isn't going anywhere, but the artists who last in it will be the ones who used this starting point as a foundation rather than a final destination.

Amy Sherald: American Sublime | Whitney Museum of American Art
Amy Sherald: American Sublime | Whitney Museum of American Art