Why This Film Still Holds Up
The Prince of Egypt is DreamWorks' second feature film, released in 1998, and it was the studio's first serious attempt at a big-budget animated epic. It earned two Academy Award nominations — one for Best Original Song for "When You Believe" and one for Best Original Musical or Comedy Score. It didn't win either, but the craft on display was genuinely ahead of its time for what an independent animation studio could pull off. I've spent years working in animation and film restoration, and I've screened this more times than I can count on different projection setups. Here's what actually matters when you're dealing with it now.
The Prince Of Egypt A Look Back At The Oscarwinning Animated Film
DreamWorks built this film using a hybrid workflow that was pretty unusual for 1998. They combined hand-drawn animation with early digital ink-and-paint techniques, then composited everything through their own proprietary software pipeline. Imagine Studios handled the character animation, while other vendors took care of the backgrounds and effects work. The film's most ambitious sequence — the Red Sea parting — used a combination of traditional cel animation and some of the earliest digital crowd simulation tools DreamWorks had at the time. The voice cast was assembled by talent agents who weren't initially interested in giving their clients animated projects. Ralph Fiennes, Michelle Pfeiffer, Sandra Bullock, and Steve Martin were all attached because the studio convinced them the material justified the pay cut from their live-action rates. Jeff Goldblum was already established in voice work at that point, so his casting was a no-brainer. One thing people consistently get wrong about this production is the scope of the background art. The desert and Egyptian environments were painted by a team of about forty artists over roughly fourteen months. These weren't quick washes or concept sketches — they were fully rendered watercolor and gouache paintings, each one taking between three and eight days depending on complexity. The lighting reference for those paintings came from actual on-location photography that the art director's team shot in Morocco and Egypt before production really got going.
When I was restoring a print of the film for a retrospective screening, I ran into a specific problem with the color timing on the plagues sequence. The original dye-transfer print we were using had shifted noticeably toward magenta in the shadow areas, which made the green frog plague look more purple than intended. The issue traced back to the fact that the dye-transfer process DreamWorks used for the theatrical release had degraded differently across the three color channels over twenty-five years. I worked with a colorist to rebuild the correction curve from the original digital intermediate files, which were still stored on LTO tape in the DreamWorks vault. That took about six hours of careful frame-by-frame matching, but it resolved the issue cleanly. The key was having access to those original DI files rather than trying to salvage the print directly. The animation itself represents a significant shift in how DreamWorks approached feature animation. Prior to this, their first film Antz was largely computer-generated and deliberately stylized to avoid competing with Pixar's technical polish. The Prince of Egypt was the studio's statement that they could do traditional animation at a comparable level. They hired Tom Sito, David Silverman, and Bruce W. Smith as directing animators, all of whom had Disney backgrounds. The result is a film where the character acting feels genuinely rooted in the classic Disney tradition — exaggerated expressions, clear silhouettes, readable body language — even though the rendering pipeline was entirely different. The voice acting deserves more attention than it usually gets. Patrick Stewart's narration isn't just decorative; it's structurally necessary because the film has no exposition scenes in the traditional sense. The story assumes the audience already knows the Biblical source material, so Stewart's narration carries the narrative weight that would normally come from dialogue or visual setup. This is an unusual dramatic choice for a family animated film, and it means the movie plays more like an Oratorio than a typical animated feature. Some audiences found that distancing effect off-putting at the time. It works if you accept the format, and it doesn't work if you're expecting something closer to a conventional character-driven story.
Get the Full Details

The music by Hans Zimmer and Stephen Schwartz is probably the most technically interesting component of the film. Zimmer handled the orchestral score, which was recorded at Abbey Road Studios with the London Voices providing choral arrangements. Schwartz wrote the songs, and the vocal recording sessions brought together both the film's professional voice cast and Broadway-trained singers for the bigger numbers. The "Deliver Us" sequence alone required three separate recording sessions because the choral arrangements demanded a level of precision that the mixed cast couldn't achieve in a single pass. If you're looking to watch or acquire this film, the Blu-ray release from DreamWorks is the definitive version. It was mastered from the original digital intermediate, which gives it significantly better dynamic range and color accuracy than any DVD pressing. The 1080p transfer holds up well even on larger screens. There is no 4K UHD release as of this writing, and given the nature of the original source material — traditionally animated frames composited digitally — a true 4K scan would likely not show meaningful improvement over the Blu-ray unless DreamWorks undertakes a full remaster from the hand-painted cels, which they haven't indicated any plans to do. The streaming availability changes periodically depending on licensing agreements. At the time of this writing, it has cycled between Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Peacock. If you need guaranteed access, the physical media route is the only reliable option.
There are some real limitations to keep in mind. The film runs about one hour and forty minutes, which is long for a traditionally animated feature, particularly one without a lot of comedic relief in the middle act. The second half drags noticeably compared to the first. The religious source material also means the film's humor is fairly subdued — there are funny moments, mostly from Steve Martin's character, but the overall tone stays serious throughout. This isn't a flaw in execution; it's a creative decision that alienated some younger viewers at release and still does today. The song "When You Believe" became a cultural touchstone largely because of the dual-artist single release with Mariah Carey and Whitney Houston, which sold millions of copies and kept the film in public consciousness far beyond its theatrical run. The film itself doesn't really set up that song emotionally in the way the studio expected. It appears near the end as a somewhat tacked-on musical number rather than emerging organically from the narrative, which is why the Academy nominated it but didn't award it. What makes this film worth revisiting is the sheer amount of hand-crafted artistry involved. Every background painting, every character model, every cel was physically produced. The Red Sea sequence alone contained over two thousand individual elements — waves, crowds, debris, light rays — that were all animated separately and composited together. Doing that in 1998 without modern cloud rendering meant the animation team spent roughly eighteen months on that single sequence from initial layout to final composite. That kind of time investment is essentially impossible in today's production environment, where the same sequence might be completed in four to six months using automated rigging and simulation tools.
There's a practical reason to seek this out beyond nostalgia. For anyone studying the history of animation or the transition from traditional to digital workflows, this film sits at a interesting pivot point. It was made during the last years when major studios were still producing hand-drawn features at scale before the industry fully shifted to CGI. The production decisions, the problems the team solved, the workflow bottlenecks — all of that is documented in interviews and behind-the-scenes material that's still available online. It's a useful case study for understanding how animation studios adapted to digital tools without completely abandoning traditional techniques.
