What You Actually Find When You Dig Into These Obituary Records
I spent three weeks last year going through compiled obituary data from a few regional funeral homes for a genealogy client, and the process was exactly as tedious as you would expect. Most people approach these records thinking they will find neat, complete stories about their ancestors. They do not. What they find is a fragmented paper trail that requires a specific set of skills to interpret correctly. I am going to walk through how to actually get usable information out of funeral home obituary records, including what most people miss and where the process breaks down. The records from places like Westhaven Memorial tend to follow a standard template that has not changed much since the 1970s. Death date, age, surviving family members, and the service location. The surprise most researchers hit is how many details are deliberately omitted. Causes of death are rarely listed. Birth dates are sometimes wrong because the family provided them under stress. Addresses from the 1980s and earlier are often incomplete or use rural route numbers that do not map cleanly to anything modern. I ran into a specific problem with a file from 1987 where the obituary listed the deceased as having been born in "East Haven" but the death certificate on the same form used "East Havin." A single typo in a name field can send a researcher down a completely wrong branch. The workaround I use is to always cross-reference the funeral home record against the county death certificate filing number before treating any detail as accurate. The funeral home does not verify spelling against legal documents. They take the information from the family at face value, which means errors are common and nobody catches them until you hit a wall later.
Another thing people do not expect is the gap between what gets published in the newspaper and what stays in the funeral home file. The published version is usually shorter, edited for space, and sanitized. The original funeral home obituary that they kept on file often contains more information, including church name, burial location, and sometimes a fuller list of survivors. If you only look at the newspaper clipping, you are missing roughly half the available data. My process is to request the original funeral home copy through a records request, not just rely on whatever was printed locally. Here is a counter-intuitive point about these records that most beginners miss: the dates are often more reliable than the names. Funeral directors tend to verify death dates from the medical certifier, but they have no obligation to check whether the spelling of "Margaret" versus "Marguerite" matches a birth certificate. I have seen the same person appear under three different name spellings across three different funeral homes in the same county over a ten-year period. When you are building a family tree from these sources, always prioritize the death date and location as your anchor point, then treat the name as a variable that needs confirmation from a separate document. The biggest bottleneck in this work is access. Many funeral homes do not digitize their files. Some will not release them at all without a direct family connection or a court order. Others keep records for only a set number of years and then destroy them. I have lost track of how many requests I have sent to funeral homes that simply stopped responding after the third follow-up. If you are working with older records, your best bet is to go through the county health department or state vital records office, where death certificates are filed separately and tend to have higher retention rates.
When I actually pull a file, the workflow is pretty mechanical. I open the obituary, extract the core facts into a spreadsheet, flag anything that looks inconsistent, and then go hunting for the corresponding death certificate and burial record. This usually takes me about twenty to thirty minutes per case if the records are accessible, longer if I have to make phone calls or fill out request forms. It is not complicated. It is just repetitive and requires patience. There are also some limitations that are worth being upfront about. A significant portion of these records are incomplete by design. If the family chose privacy, the obituary will be sparse. If the funeral home had poor record-keeping practices, the file may be missing key pages. And if the person died in a hospital or hospice rather than at home, the obituary may not even list the correct place of death because the funeral home only received partial information. These are not flaws in your research method. They are structural problems with the source material itself. For anyone actually doing this work, I would suggest starting with the county level rather than the funeral home level. Death certificates are public record in most jurisdictions and they contain far more standardized data than any obituary ever will. Use the funeral home records as supplementary material, not as your primary source. Treat them like the secondary witness they are, not the primary evidence.
Get the Full Details
