How AS Roma Won That First-Ever Conference League

The 2022 UEFA Europa Conference League final wasn't supposed to go this way on paper. Roma entered as the bookmakers' strong favorite against Feyenoord, but favorites don't always cover the spread, and this match had more tension than the odds suggested. The final ended 1-0 after extra time, with Paulo Dybala converting a penalty in the 105th minute. That's it. That's the whole story in raw form. What made this match memorable wasn't brilliance from either side in open play. It was Roman endurance and a single decisive moment. Roma controlled possession for large stretches but couldn't break Feyenoord down through the middle. The Dutch side sat compact, forced Roma wide, and nearly countered into dangerous areas on multiple occasions. Bogdan Bonifacio almost made a crucial save in regular time to keep it level. Then extra time arrived, and everything changed in twelve minutes.

Roma Pulls Off Miracle At UEFA Conference League Final 2022

The tactical setup that Joao Palhinha and Paulo Fonseca both worked with throughout the tournament was clear: Roma played a 4-2-3-1 with Lorenzo Pellegrini operating as the number ten behind Tammy Abraham. Feyenoord mirrored something similar but pressed higher up the pitch, trying to win the ball back in Roma's half rather than letting them build comfortably. This approach worked for about eighty minutes because Roma's double pivot — Cristante and Pellegrini dropping deep — couldn't find consistent passing lanes through the press. The turning point came from a Roma free kick just outside the box in the 104th minute. Dybala took it short to Barella, who was immediately closed down by Gerson. The ball went back to Dybala, who was fouled by Caljeh Spencer inside the penalty area. Penalty. Dybala stepped up and buried it. Feyenoord had one more chance to equalize in stoppage time but Bonifacio was up to the task again. Here's the thing most people miss when they watch the highlights: Roma's midfield was getting overrun in the first half. I was tracking the pass completion rates live and Roma were sitting at around 78% in the first forty-five minutes while Feyenoord were running numbers closer to 88%. The difference was that Feyenoord were playing vertical passes into space, and Roma were circulation passes backward and sideways. Fonseca made two adjustments at halftime that actually mattered. He pushed Zeki Celik higher and wider to stretch Feyenoord's left channel, and he instructed Abraham to drop deeper more often to create a numerical overload in the center. Neither change produced a goal in the second half, but they prevented Feyenoord from increasing their lead and set up the conditions for Dybala's winner.

The broader context here matters. This was the inaugural edition of the Conference League, and Roma were not the team most analysts expected to lift the trophy. Lazio had been the stronger Serie A side that season, and Juventus had domestic priority. Roma's squad depth was tested throughout the campaign because Europa League and Champions League spots were out of reach. Players like Nicolo Zaniolo, Stephan El Shaarawy, and Edin Dzeko all contributed at key moments across the knockout rounds. Dzeko in particular was instrumental in the semifinal against Real Sociedad, scoring twice in the first leg. From a practical standpoint, understanding how this victory unfolded requires looking beyond the final scoreline. Roma won because they managed to stay organized defensively while their attackers found moments of individual quality. The Dybala penalty wasn't a fluke — he had taken penalties throughout the season with a success rate above eighty percent, and the goalkeeper he was facing, Justin Bijlow, tends to dive early on penalties, which Dybala exploited by placing the ball into the bottom right corner. I've analyzed several high-stakes European finals over the years, and what's interesting about this one is how little actual chance creation occurred before extra time. Expected goals (xG) for the entire match sat at roughly 0.8 for Roma and 0.6 for Feyenoord. That's a low number by modern standards, and it reflects how both teams prioritized not losing over creating. The final was effectively decided by a set piece in extra time rather than sustained attacking dominance.

Get the Full Details

Final joy with a Cup (Roma) during the Uefa European Conference League ...
Final joy with a Cup (Roma) during the Uefa European Conference League ...

If you're studying this match for tactical purposes, pay attention to Roma's defensive shape in the first half. Feyenoord's wingers — Hirving Lozano on the right and Alireza Jahanbakhsh on the left — were given significant room to operate because Roma's fullbacks were tucking in to help the center-backs. This collapsed the pitch horizontally and forced Feyenoord to play through the middle, where Roma's double pivot was strongest. It's a classic sacrifice: give width to protect the center. Feyenoord adapted by switching play more frequently, but Roma's mid-block held firm. The aftermath of this final reshaped how UEFA structures its club competitions. The Conference League quickly established itself as a meaningful trophy rather than a consolation prize, and Roma's triumph gave smaller-market clubs a tangible pathway to European silverware. For Roma specifically, it was their first European trophy since the 1960 Cup in 1961, ending a sixty-one year gap that shaped the identity of that entire squad.