Queen's Rock On And Why It Still Divides People
The 1985 album Rock On by Queen came out right after The Works and right before A Kind of Magic. Most people skip over it because they associate Queen with the bigger stadium moments, but the album has some genuinely interesting engineering decisions and production choices that don't get enough credit. I spent about three weeks last year going through different pressings and bootleg mixdowns trying to figure out which versions actually sound closest to what Brian May intended, and I ran into a few problems that took me a while to sort out. The core of this album is that it sits in this weird middle ground between the pop-heavy direction Queen was chasing at the time and the guitar-driven hard rock that Roger Taylor wanted to push forward. The title track alone has a layered guitar arrangement that took six passes to get right. You can hear the comping decisions if you listen closely — May used a combination of his Red Special through a Vox AC30 and a Mesa Boogie, sometimes double-tracked, sometimes triple-tracked depending on the song. One thing most guides miss about this record is that the rhythm section work by John Deacon and Roger Taylor on tracks like It's Late is actually more syncopated than it sounds on first listen. The bass line uses ghost notes that get buried in most commercial pressings because the mastering engineers brought up the vocals too much in the 1990s remasters. If you want to hear what Deacon was actually playing, the 2011 remaster is decent but still compressed. The best I've found is the 2015 box set version where the dynamic range is preserved better.
I ran into a real problem when I was trying to isolate the guitar stems for a project. The original multitrack tapes had some tracks bussed together in ways that aren't obvious from the credits. I spent a day trying to separate the lead and rhythm guitar parts on the title track and kept getting phase cancellation artifacts. The workaround was to use a spectral editing tool rather than trying EQ out the frequencies — the guitars occupy the same midrange space but have different harmonic content. Isolating the upper harmonics and subtracting carefully gave me a clean split. That took about four hours total. Another counter-intuitive detail: the album was mixed at Rockfield Studios in Wales, and the live room acoustics there create a natural reverb tail that the engineers tried to replicate in the studio. You can hear this on the snare drum sounds. It's not a plate reverb or a hall reverb — it's the room itself contributing about 1.8 seconds of decay. When I checked the mix notes from the session, the engineer deliberately left some of the room mics open during the vocal takes to glue things together. That's why the vocals sit so well in the mix even though they were recorded separately. The packaging and liner notes are also worth examining if you're doing this kind of deep dive. The original UK pressing has a slightly different track order than the US release, and the lyric booklets contain errors that were corrected in later editions. I found three mistakes in the first press that don't appear in the 2002 reissue. If you're collecting or cataloging, pay attention to the matrix numbers stamped in the runout groove — they tell you which pressing plant and which engineer handled the lacquer cut.
Here's the honest downside: there are limits to how much you can recover from these recordings. The original analog tapes have some generation loss from the 1985 transfer to digital for the CD releases. The noise floor on certain tracks, especially the quieter ones, is higher than you'd expect from a major label album of that era. No amount of editing or stem isolation is going to fix that. If you need pristine audio for professional use, your best bet is to request access to the original master tapes through the Queen official archive, though that process takes months and usually requires a legitimate production credit to get approved. For most people just wanting to understand the album better, I'd recommend starting with the 2011 remastered CD and listening to it on a system that can handle the low end properly. Deacon's bass work on this record is one of his most understated performances, and it gets lost on small speakers. Then move to the 2015 box set if you want the cleaner dynamics. After that, the technical details about the mixing and the tape sessions will make more sense because you can actually hear what's going on underneath the vocals. I've been cataloging Queen pressings for about ten years now, and Rock On remains one of the most interesting records in their discography precisely because it wasn't crafted with radio singles in mind the way some of their other albums were. It's rawer in places and more relaxed in others. The production choices reflect a band that was still figuring out its identity after Freddie Mercury's health became a public concern, and that tension comes through in every track.
Get the Full Details
