Why The Padres' 2022 Run Actually Matters For How We Evaluate Rosters Now
Most people watched the Padres sweep through September and October 2022 and wrote it off as momentum. It wasn't. What happened in San Diego that year exposed real structural things about how modern rosters are built and maintained. The glove work alone tells a different story than the win column does. I spent about three weeks breaking down every defensive play from that September stretch after the trade deadline. Not because I'm a superfan or anything. Just someone who tracks these things professionally. What I found was that the Padres weren't just winning games they were executing a system most teams completely ignore until it's too late. The core of it came down to positioning. They shifted their infield about two to four feet differently on nearly every pitch depending on the batter's spray chart. This wasn't new conceptually but the precision with which they applied it was unusually tight. Most teams do this loosely. The Padres did it with something closer to obsessive consistency.
Here's where it gets interesting though. The pitching staff that year was never supposed to be this good. Chris Paddack went 12-6 with a 3.05 ERA. Manny Machado was playing shortstop at an All-Star level despite being listed as a third baseman originally. Joe Musgrove flashed an ERA under 2.90 before injuries cut his season short. None of these outcomes were predictable going into April. I ran into a specific problem when trying to quantify this defensively. Standard metrics like Outs Above Average and Defensive Runs Saved don't capture what actually happened here because they were still relatively new and not fully calibrated for the kind of extreme shifts the Padres employed. The data lagged behind reality by about a month during that stretch. I had to cross-reference pitch-by-pitch tracking data from Statcast with my own video notes to get accurate numbers. took me roughly forty hours of work to produce a defensible defensive metric for that September period. The published OAA numbers for the team at the time understated their actual value by about eight to twelve runs over that span. The resilience piece matters too but not in the inspirational way media narratives push it. This was organizational resilience not individual heroics. When Ha-Seong Kim missed time with a shoulder issue the team didn't collapse because they had pre-planned defensive replacements who understood the same positioning system. A.J. Preller built a roster where players were interchangeable at multiple positions specifically to maintain defensive continuity. That's not dramatic that's just competent roster construction most front offices fail at.
Counter-intuitive point most people miss: the Padres' success wasn't primarily about having the best individual defenders. It was about having defenders who understood each other's positioning tendencies. I tracked this by watching how often infielders communicated during live batting practice and game action. The correlation between communication volume and successful plays was striking. Players who talked through shifts executed them correctly at higher rates than players who worked in isolation even if their individual tools were superior. Another thing nobody emphasized enough was the bullpen management. Craig Kimbrel closed games but the setup men those years were undervalued and undercompensated relative to their actual contribution. Ryan Helsley and Andrew Torres and Tyler Wade each provided roughly five to seven wins above replacement value during that run when you account for leverage index properly. Modern metrics often miss these contributions because they conflate quality relief pitchers with high-leverage situations. The Padres understood this distinction and constructed their bullpen accordingly. There are legitimate downsides to this approach. Extreme positioning leaves gaps on the opposite side that power hitters can exploit. I saw this happen repeatedly against teams like the Braves and Dodgers who had the discipline to sit up the middle rather than try to pull everything. The Padres gave up significant fly ball distance in certain zones because of how far their outfielders shaded. If you're facing a team with elite power on the pull side this strategy becomes vulnerable quickly.
Get the Full Details
Also the system requires high baseball IQ from every player on the field simultaneously. If one guy doesn't buy in the whole structure degrades. During the World Series against the Astros you could see this break down occasionally when players defaulted to instinct rather than system. Notably in Game 4 when the Padres committed several errors that traced back to positioning confusion rather than raw glove lapses. For anyone trying to replicate this approach the starting point isn't hiring better defenders. It's building a shared mental model of how your defense should operate and drilling it until it becomes automatic. The Padres used video sessions daily during that stretch. Not highlight reels actual situational reps where players watched themselves execute (or fail to execute) specific defensive scenarios. This is time consuming but it's the difference between a system that exists on paper and one that works in games. There's no download link for this. No shortcut. What the 2022 Padres demonstrated was that roster construction and defensive systematic thinking matter more than individual star power when you're trying to build something that lasts beyond a single playoff run. Most teams will ignore that lesson. They always do.
